[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/06/02]
On Wed, Jun 02, 2004 at 02:35:08PM +0100, Richard Clamp wrote: > Certainly the 09defer.t would tickle this. This gets things passing more tests, though of course adds in a dependency on 0.96 for the ->remove_from_object_index method. --- lib/Siesta/DBI.pm (revision 1525) +++ lib/Siesta/DBI.pm (working copy) @@ -73,7 +73,13 @@ return 1; } +sub delete { + my $self = shift; + $self->remove_from_object_index; + return $self->SUPER::delete( @_ ); +} + 1; __DATA__ I still need to reach out to the Class::DBI folks and find out where that needs to live though, Class::DBI proper or Class::DBI::SQLite. -- Richard Clamp <richardc@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>There's stuff above here
Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52