[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/10/09]
Simon Wistow wrote: >On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 11:53:37AM -0700, Roderick A. Anderson said: > > >>This appears to be a reoccuring problem when dealing with many perl >>applications/modules >> >> > >See this thread > >http://siesta.unixbeard.net/siesta/archive/siesta-dev/2004/05/21/baf24960.html > >and this patch > > Whod-a-thunk (a western United States colloquialism) it would be this complicated. Well Siesta is still pretty new -- version-wise. I guess I'm spoiled. I'd say that 95%+ of the perl based packages I've installed and used have given me no problems verses only 80% of other OS and other programming language packages. >http://siesta.unixbeard.net/siesta/archive/siesta-commit/2004/06/02/5bf1e0d9.html > >As Richard said - "Sassen, frassen Class::DBI" > > So are there any _really good_ reasons to use Class::DBI verses plain-old-DBI calls? (Am I using the right terms?) And doesn't this, what appears to be a changing API, violate good OOP practices? I am only at chapter 5 of Damian's book but this sticks in my mind. Thanks for the pointers. Rod -- --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses by Declude Virus]There's stuff above here
Generated at 14:00 on 11 Nov 2004 by mariachi 0.52