Re: More Perl hate

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/09/16]

At 17:57 +0100 2003.09.13, Simon Cozens wrote:
>The syntax is *exactly the same*, but the effect of "new X::Y" is
>way different. No DWIM here. Why the hell Larry decided that being
>like C++, of all God-forsaken languages, was a good idea in this
>instance is completely beyond me, especially give how much it fucks with
>the language.

I am missing something, surely.  In the first example there is no X::Y
package.  What are you trying to point out here?

-- 
Chris Nandor                      pudge@xxxxx.xxx    http://pudge.net/
Open Source Development Network    pudge@xxxx.xxx     http://osdn.com/

• More Perl hate Simon Cozens 17:57 on 13 Sep 2003
  • Re: More Perl hate Chris Nandor 15:37 on 16 Sep 2003
• Re: Perl Earle Martin 06:19 on 14 Sep 2003
  • peter (Peter da Silva) 06:31 on 14 Sep 2003
• Chris Nandor 15:29 on 16 Sep 2003
  • sabrina downard 15:38 on 16 Sep 2003
    • a little list pedantry, was Re: Perl mjinks 17:37 on 16 Sep 2003
    • Re: Perl Jazzy Koala 01:15 on 25 Feb 2004
      • too deep to show
  • peter (Peter da Silva) 16:33 on 16 Sep 2003
    • Yoz Grahame 17:01 on 16 Sep 2003

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52