Re: Dear iCal. You are lame.

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/10/09]

From: Simon Wistow
Subject: Re: Dear iCal. You are lame.
Date: 09:35 on 09 Oct 2005

On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 07:45:03PM -0700, David King said:
> Yes, that's pretty bad. But would you be much happier to find that
> the iCal format maintains information as to the *visual* representation
> of the items?

Does it? iCal or ICalendar? There's an Apple hate brewing.

The ICalendar standard (RFC2445) is actually pretty good although the 
spec is a ballache to read and there are some nasty edgecases to pick 
up.

There's stuff above here

Re: Dear iCal. You are lame. David King 03:45 on 07 Oct 2005
- sabrina downard 20:14 on 07 Oct 2005
- Simon Wistow 09:35 on 09 Oct 2005
  - Smylers 17:35 on 09 Oct 2005
    - too deep to show

Generated at 17:00 on 10 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52