[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/12/17]
demerphq <demerphq@xxxxx.xxx> writes:
> On 12/17/06, Peter da Silva <peter@xxxxxxx.xxx> wrote:
[...]
>> Well, except for Forth. Or maybe Lisp. And I'll bet Bourne could have
>> come pretty damn close with "C" macros... look at BOURNEGOL for
>> evidence.
>
> Hmm, I didn't realize that either allowed their syntax to be extended
> to support perl style pattern operators or quoting.
I hate your crippled and pathetic little languages only slightly less
than I hate this endless off-topic non-hate!
http://www.cs.cmu.edu/afs/cs/project/ai-repository/ai/lang/lisp/impl/awk/0.html
An awk interpreter in Lisp.
http://search.cpan.org/~jtobey/Emacs-EPL-0.7/
The reverse, at least approximately. Whee!
http://norvig.com/SILK.html
Scheme in Java!
>> The fact that when people using these other languages try to make
>> them look like something else they're treated like a bad joke should
>> tell you why this is WHY Perl is hateful. And the "Perl Hackers"
>> crowing about how cool this hatefulness is is probably the most
>> hateful thing about it.
>
> I can think of a bunch of hateful things about Perl, but the regexp
> operator syntax is not one of them.
You know what? I don't care! I hate it anyway! Hate!
Daniel
All are turning complete, and all can do any bloody thing you like.
--
Digital Infrastructure Solutions -- making IT simple, stable and secure
Phone: 0401 155 707 email: contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
http://digital-infrastructure.com.au/
There's stuff above here
Generated at 22:02 on 27 Dec 2006 by mariachi 0.52