Re: C#, .Net, and Mono

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/12/27]

From: peter (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: C#, .Net, and Mono
Date: 18:39 on 27 Dec 2006

> > I can't parse that sentence. Each part of it makes sense individually, but
> > put together the result is noise. What do you mean by a completely stupid
> > design being sound?

> Small decisions are often right.  Issues which do not touch on semantics
> are often fine.  Multi-arch JIT has strong work.  

OK, "Mono contains many sound components, but the design is completely stupid"?

So it's like audiofool speaker wires with gold-plated optical connects and
homeopathically aligned oxygen-free copper decals?

(no message)
- We know what you need, and we'll push it down your throat. Yossi Kreinin 13:27 on 22 Dec 2006
  - Re: We know what you need, and we'll push it down your throat. Abigail 13:32 on 22 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
  - Jonathan Stowe 13:57 on 22 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
  - Peter da Silva 16:22 on 22 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
- Peter da Silva 15:55 on 22 Dec 2006
- Yossi Kreinin 11:31 on 23 Dec 2006
  - jrodman 12:54 on 23 Dec 2006
- Michael Poole 19:18 on 23 Dec 2006
- Yossi Kreinin 09:57 on 27 Dec 2006
  - C#, .Net, and Mono jrodman 14:02 on 27 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
  - Re: We know what you need, and we'll push it down your throat. peter (Peter da Silva) 15:40 on 27 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
  - Aaron J. Grier 19:15 on 28 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
- peter (Peter da Silva) 18:39 on 27 Dec 2006
  - Daniel Pittman 21:51 on 27 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
- A. Pagaltzis 03:35 on 29 Dec 2006
  - Peter da Silva 11:35 on 29 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
- Yossi Kreinin 13:21 on 29 Dec 2006
  - Jarkko Hietaniemi 13:32 on 29 Dec 2006
  - Jarkko Hietaniemi 13:57 on 29 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show
  - Peter da Silva 15:05 on 29 Dec 2006
  - Sean Conner 20:15 on 29 Dec 2006
    - too deep to show

Generated at 03:02 on 01 Jan 2007 by mariachi 0.52