[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2002/09/10]
* Richard Clamp (richardc@xxxxxxxxx.xxx) wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 06:56:30PM +0100, Simon Wistow wrote:
> > ... or at least an announcement.
> >
> > I'm not sure if this a verboten subject or something but - what needs to
> > be done to do an initial release?
> >
> > The only major thing I can think of after today's checkins is the
> > initial installation of the database and maybe creation of a siesta user
> > or something for security reasons or summat.
>
> And ensuring that subscriptions can happen from the wire.
>
> > We have complete configuration via nacho,
>
> Then t/05setup_database.t needs to be rewritten in terms of it.
>
> > we have installation
> > documentation, we have fairly comprehensive tests (I need to do tests
> > for the plugin order stuff I've done today)
>
> I think the plugin order stuff is fucked. Certainly I'd expect ID to
> be a unique column with a sequence on it and so specifying explicit
> values into it will just lead to badness. An extra "order" column is
> probably called for, and since we're no longer doing things with
> Class::DBI we don't actually need that id field, so we may as well
> just rename it.
>
imho, we should keep it, as it allows future storage mechanisms to abstract
better
i'll reply to the rest of the email tommorow
--
Greg McCarroll http://www.mccarroll.org.uk/~gem/
jabber://greg@xxxxxx.xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
msn://greg@xxxxxxxxx.xxxxx.xx.xx
There's stuff above here
Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52