Re: bind9 documentation

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/10/17]

From: Aglet
Subject: Re: bind9 documentation
Date: 22:55 on 17 Oct 2003
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:47:11 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote:

>> we hates unreadable docbook documentation
>> 	[...]
> 
> That's not DocBook.  It looks like the result of converting DocBook to
> HTML.  Just run it through tidy(1).

I want the benighted authors of the documents to run them through tidy(1)
*before* they give them to me, so I don't need tidy(1) or a web "browser"
disturbing the karmic balance of my DNS server.  Or better still, run them
through lynx --dump and give me a text file.  I can live without the
emphasis, thanks, but I can't live with that nonsense, valid XHTML or no.
There's stuff above here

Generated at 16:00 on 18 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52