[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/10/17]
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003 23:47:11 +0100, Nik Clayton wrote: >> we hates unreadable docbook documentation >> [...] > > That's not DocBook. It looks like the result of converting DocBook to > HTML. Just run it through tidy(1). I want the benighted authors of the documents to run them through tidy(1) *before* they give them to me, so I don't need tidy(1) or a web "browser" disturbing the karmic balance of my DNS server. Or better still, run them through lynx --dump and give me a text file. I can live without the emphasis, thanks, but I can't live with that nonsense, valid XHTML or no.There's stuff above here
Generated at 16:00 on 18 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52