Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/26]

From: Nicholas Clark
Subject: Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)
Date: 18:51 on 26 Apr 2005

I hate the way that the subversion client library code is so efficient that
despite being written in C, it can be outperformed by an alternative
implementation in Perl code. (svk).

Meanwhile I'll hate svk for having shed loads of dependencies including SWIG,
and thereby being a bitch to build from source.

My other opinions of svk and svn are off topic for this list.

Nicholas Clark

There's stuff above here

Arthur Bergman 18:45 on 26 Apr 2005
- Nicholas Clark 18:51 on 26 Apr 2005
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 00:39 on 27 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - Re: Subversion Jarkko Hietaniemi 05:46 on 27 Apr 2005
Re: Subversion Robert G. Werner 02:10 on 27 Apr 2005
- Juerd 09:59 on 27 Apr 2005
Yoz Grahame 17:38 on 27 Apr 2005
- Simon Wistow 18:10 on 27 Apr 2005
Michael G Schwern 01:36 on 28 Apr 2005
- Aaron J. Grier 19:14 on 29 Apr 2005

Generated at 02:00 on 03 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52