Re: Mail.app

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/07/30]

From: Michael G Schwern
Subject: Re: Mail.app
Date: 00:14 on 30 Jul 2005
On Fri, Jul 29, 2005 at 12:01:59PM -0500, Luke Kanies wrote:
> I don't know, man; I'm not sure anyone with emacs installed gets to
> complain about applications wasting a lot of space...  140MB for an
> editor?

$ du -sk /Applications/NeoOfficeJ.app/
344864  /Applications/NeoOfficeJ.app

$ du -sk /sw/lib/xemacs* /sw/bin/xemacs*
114400  /sw/lib/xemacs
22532   /sw/lib/xemacs-21.4.15
6840    /sw/bin/xemacs-21.4.15

$ du -sk /Applications/Mail.app/
24604   /Applications/Mail.app

$ du -sk /Applications/thunderbird.app/
32556   /Applications/thunderbird.app

$ du -sk /Applications/Firefox.app/
25928   /Applications/Firefox.app

Open Office is the reigning champ.  Thunderbird weighs in more than Mail.app 
and, I'm surprised to see, Firefox.

XEmacs is still up there, but that's XEmacs-sumo which has every extension
known to man plus the elisp source code.  If you strip out the elisp its down
to 74375K.  Just xemacs, no source, no sumo, is 31620K.  But its the most
bang for the bits as you get an editor, a graphical web browser, several
mail clients AND you can play tetris and psychoanalyze-zippy!


-- 
Michael G Schwern     schwern@xxxxx.xxx     http://www.pobox.com/~schwern
You know what the chain of command is? It's the chain I go get and beat you 
with 'til you understand who's in ruttin' command here. 
        -- Jayne Cobb, "Firefly"
There's stuff above here

Generated at 08:00 on 13 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52