[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/10/17]
On Oct 17, 2005, at 6:46 AM, David Cantrell wrote: > And even if it did make UFS the default it would still suck, because it > doesn't support large filesystems. Want a 2TB fs? You've got no > choice > but to use HFS+. OK, I'd assume that if they were to make UFS the default they'd start by picking up the latest version from FreeBSD (like they did for Panther). That one uses 64-bit block pointers, and while all the userland tools haven't been upgraded yet they'd be rolling their own anyway. Not doing that would be hateful, of course, and on topic.
Generated at 20:00 on 17 Oct 2005 by mariachi 0.52