Re: Eclipse

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/11/01]

From: David Cantrell
Subject: Re: Eclipse
Date: 20:10 on 01 Nov 2006
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 02:52:18PM +0100, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
> * David Cantrell <david@xxxxxxxx.xxx.xx> [2006-10-29 14:10]:
> > No, that was a backslash, a three, a two, and a seven.  Please
> > try again. If you disagree, then consider my usual invitation
> > to the Unicodistas to be extended - I'll take you seriously
> > once you've configured all my machines and all my applications
> > to display your foolishness properly.
> Here's a nickel, get yourself some technology from this decade.

You say that without realising that all the machines I regularly use had
their operating system either bought or downloaded within the last two
years.  Likewise all the software I run on them.

> Or don't bother. Monolinguals can afford to stay blithely
> ignorant of any progress in the state of affairs.

I'm sure monoliguals can.  I, however, am not one of them.  As it
happens, I receive and read email in six languages, two of which fit
into ASCII (and only five of which fit into ISO-Latin-$n).  I can only
read the other four languages reliably when I'm sitting in front of a
Mac, and using an inefficient GUI MUA.

Consequently, I am very acutely aware of what limited progress there has
been in the state of affairs.  Aware, and disappointed.

> > Additionally, from looking at a unicode table, [multiplication sign]
> > is visually indistinguishable from the letter x.
> Here's a nickel, find a font that doesn't suck.

Here's a "nickel", whatever that may be (I prefer zinc, it's more useful
in Scrabble), find a clue.  Given that I'm using the default monospace
font on this 'ere modern machine, and given that unless both the multiply
sign and the letter x are next to each other I can't tell the difference,
you apparently need one.  Or are you going to change your mind and suggest
that perhaps I shouldn't be using software from this decade after all?

Along with your chunk of random metal, I'll let you in on a secret for
free.  I *work* with and *use* computers.  I stopped tinkering in
obscure corners of desktop and server operating systems* when they ceased
to be a hobby.  If Unicode is so well-supported then I jolly well expect
it to Just Work.  It doesn't.  I can only assume that if it works for
you, you must still be a mere hobbyist with sufficient spare time to
waste.  I envy you.

* tinkering with hardware and control systems is far more rewarding.
It makes louder bangs and a more interesting variety of smells.

-- 
David Cantrell | Hero of the Information Age
There's stuff above here

Generated at 20:01 on 07 Nov 2006 by mariachi 0.52