[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2002/10/16]
Simon Wistow <simon@xxxxxxxxxx.xxx> wrote: > I don't think that this would work, although I'm willing to be proved > wrong. nacho is already a really thin layer which cleans input and > formats output. This really has to be done on an application by > application basis because you could have a CLI based interface, a web > interface, a GTK interface, a ... you get the point. My idea was that you wouldn't have the cleaning code in five places, you'd only have it in one. I don't see why you'd want this to change from application to application, data validation is the same everywhere, right? Gavin. p.s. on a completely unrelated note, in Outlook Express if you hit Reply-All you get 'siesta-dev@xxxxxxxxx.xxx' twice. This is probably not a good thing.There's stuff above here
Generated at 13:56 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52