Re: Perl

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2003/09/11]

From: Simon Cozens
Subject: Re: Perl
Date: 15:44 on 11 Sep 2003

Peter da Silva:
> > Yup. Of course, this is because those "two lines" use several thousand lines
> > of Perl modules, but that's by the by.
> 
> I guess that it's on topic for the list to mention that I hate Perl.
> Not that I'm suggesting that present company includes any such idiots, but
> damn, I hate Perl. And I'll take a couple of hundred lines of rules, much
> as I'd prefer to trim them down to a couple

You seem to be unaware of the concept of abstraction.

-- 
WILLIAM: Just incidentally -- why are you wearing that?
SPIKE: Ahm -- combination of factors really. No clean clothes...
W: There never will be, you know, unless you actually clean your clothes.
S: Right.  Vicious circle.

(no message)
- Perl peter (Peter da Silva) 15:36 on 11 Sep 2003
  - Re: Perl Simon Cozens 15:44 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
  - sabrina downard 16:03 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
  - Juerd 17:24 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 18:14 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- Chris Nandor 15:15 on 13 Sep 2003
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 15:38 on 13 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- Nicholas Clark 15:43 on 16 Sep 2003
  - Chris Nandor 15:46 on 16 Sep 2003
  - Gavin Estey 15:56 on 16 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- Greg McCarroll 16:35 on 16 Sep 2003
- Chris Nandor 16:55 on 16 Sep 2003
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 19:03 on 16 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- peter (Peter da Silva) 16:28 on 25 Feb 2004
- Simon Cozens 10:32 on 26 Feb 2004

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52