Re: Perl

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/02/26]

From: Simon Cozens
Subject: Re: Perl
Date: 10:32 on 26 Feb 2004

Matt McLeod:
> Haven't you heard?  Perl is perfect.  No version has any flaw or
> bug, nor has any weird quirks.  And anyone who says otherwise is
> either taking hallucinogens or is a liar.

Don't be silly. Sometimes incompetence is an adequate explanation.

-- 
"He was a modest, good-humored boy.  It was Oxford that made him insufferable."

(no message)
- Perl peter (Peter da Silva) 15:36 on 11 Sep 2003
  - Re: Perl Simon Cozens 15:44 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
  - sabrina downard 16:03 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
  - Juerd 17:24 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 18:14 on 11 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- Chris Nandor 15:15 on 13 Sep 2003
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 15:38 on 13 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- Nicholas Clark 15:43 on 16 Sep 2003
  - Chris Nandor 15:46 on 16 Sep 2003
  - Gavin Estey 15:56 on 16 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- Greg McCarroll 16:35 on 16 Sep 2003
- Chris Nandor 16:55 on 16 Sep 2003
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 19:03 on 16 Sep 2003
    - too deep to show
- peter (Peter da Silva) 16:28 on 25 Feb 2004
- Simon Cozens 10:32 on 26 Feb 2004

Generated at 14:02 on 01 Jul 2004 by mariachi 0.52