[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2004/11/04]
All package systems suck. 1. They foster a dependency on them by programs installed with them 2. They don't play nice with libraries, headers, or programs not installed with the package system 3. There's no machine intelligence in even the simplest form to cope things being slightly off, such as the source files having been replaced with a copy one patch level greater Re #1: with every package system I've seen *except* CPAN, it won't recognize user-installed copies of programs or libraries but insists on installing its own copy. Also, they re-invent DLL hell in that library systems only tolerate one version of a module being installed at a time. Attempting to install a program that requires a newer minor version of a library requires the old version of the library to be installed which requires all of the software dependent on the old version to be installed - when none of this is necessary except installing the new module! Re #1 and #2: I tried to upgrade a FreeBSD system recently. ports has been made part of the *core* installation mechanism, making it unavoidable. I manually upgraded core libraries on the previous install, so pkgsrc was unable to uninstall the old core libraries while upgrading because it didn't know where they came from, so it barfed, ruining the install entirely and failing to upgrade it. This is idiotic. Re #2: Every now and then, someone needs to customize software - god forbid! Often it's because it won't build out of the box. But customize just one program, and every time you try to install anything, pkgsrc/ports/etc will try to either blow away your copy and likely fail to rebuild it or else fail entirely to recognize it's been installed. Re #2: things like gconf and these -config programs in PATH break the package systems as its no longer possible to keep the ports tree and the /usr/local trees distinct - if any version of any library doesn't exactly match, making the multiple installations tolerant of each other, ports will always find the version you installed and try and fail to use it, or else when building things by hand, it'll find the ports version. After using NetBSD since 0.9 and building software by hand my whole life, I've given up. Modern software doesn't build. It's too unportable - the essence of portability is minimizing dependencies, not integrating them in droves. For the 30 or 40 libraries required by anything, one of them is sure to be completely broken on any platform except Linux. Despite weeks of my life invested and every assurance it works, it's been since Mozilla 1.1 since I've successfully built Mozilla on NetBSD - and for the missing dependencies and broken object hierachies, I think the leaked Windows source code would be more likely to build and run. So I run Linux binary emulation and copy binaries and libs wholesale from Knoppix. It's tragic that this crud won't build apart from some elaborate but constricting package system that never seems to work right. Don't these dorks realize that some day Linux might go out of fashion and people will still want to run this software, just like CPM, DOS, Ultrix, and Solaris all went out of style? -scott On 0, Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@xxx.xx> wrote: > > > > What's wrong with the fucking mirrors? Why don't I just blow OS X away > > and install Debian instead? At least it has a functional packaging system. > > I just simply blow away Fink. Finks sucks rotten eggs. Through a very > thin straw. With big chunks in it. > > So far I think I have repeated the following cycle three times. > There won't be a fourth time. > > (1) Install Fink to get software X installed. > (2) Get X installed. > (3) Install a few pieces of software (Y, Z) more. > (4) Observer how Fink gets more and more unstable. > (5) Try compiling something that hasn't been "finked" and notice > that Fink has somehow fucked up the system outside of its tree. > Yes, it should be impossible. > (6) Realize you can live without X, Y, Z. > (7) Uninstall Fink with rm -rf. > (8) Reinstall X, Y, Z manually with configure --prefix=/opt or the moral > equivalent and notice how Things Just Work. > (9) Wonder why you ever though installing Fink was a good idea. > > The only excuse Fink has is following dependencies. And it doesn't > get even them right. I don't know whether its Fink to blame or > the packagers to blame. But I really don't have the time or > interest to fix it. So fuck it. > > (The only package management I have ever personally seen "just work" > was the BSD ports/packages system. It's like CPAN.pm, it just works. > Pull down the source, configure, and compile it. No fucking binary > installations. AFAICT Gentoo is similar for Linux.) > > -- > Jarkko Hietaniemi <jhi@xxx.xx> http://www.iki.fi/jhi/ "There is this special > biologist word we use for 'stable'. It is 'dead'." -- Jack CohenThere's stuff above here
Generated at 00:02 on 06 Nov 2004 by mariachi 0.52