[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2006/12/09]
On Sat, 2006-12-09 at 16:43 +0200, Yossi Kreinin wrote: > P.P.P.S. why is tcsh located in different places in SuSE and RHEL? I'm not > saying that one of the locations is right, just that, um, I don't /understand/ > the person that saw the stupid program located in some stupid place and said > "hmmm, I know a MUCH BETTER place!". What makes a human move a shell? P.P.P.P.S. Why are you using tcsh anyway? With a choice of perfectly usable (if not, unfortunately, actually perfect) shells such as zsh or bash, there's no excuse for using a csh derivative. Heck, there's even ksh-93 if you're really keen. As to the location, maybe someone didn't see where it was and decide on a better place. Maybe two people independently wondered where to put it and came up with different solutions. Of course, one of them therefore must be wrong, and since the shell should always be in /bin it should be obvious who was the dunce. Cheers, Martin.
Generated at 22:02 on 27 Dec 2006 by mariachi 0.52