Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/26]

From: peter (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)
Date: 17:37 on 26 Apr 2005

> > Can anyone name a single piece of software that doesn't suck? There must 
> > be some small, perfectly formed jewel out there that does something 
> > useful, right? Right?

> halt(8)

That's a symlink to reboot, now at revision 1.24 with several main forks and
a revision log almost 7k long. And that ignores all the kernel pain that
dealing with ACPI imposes.

(no message)
- Upgrading without central packaging Juerd 13:21 on 23 Apr 2005
  - Re: Upgrading without central packaging peter (Peter da Silva) 14:16 on 23 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 22:49 on 23 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
- Michael G Schwern 23:29 on 23 Apr 2005
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 02:11 on 24 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 15:38 on 24 Apr 2005
- Re: Sending mail (was Re: Upgrading without central packaging) Chris Devers 18:19 on 24 Apr 2005
  - Re: Sending mail Daniel Pittman 00:48 on 25 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
- Xtina 17:01 on 26 Apr 2005
  - Simon Wistow 17:06 on 26 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - Earle Martin 01:22 on 03 May 2005
- peter (Peter da Silva) 17:37 on 26 Apr 2005
  - John Sinteur 17:41 on 26 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - Darrell Fuhriman 17:49 on 26 Apr 2005
  - David Cantrell 17:51 on 26 Apr 2005
- Arthur Bergman 18:45 on 26 Apr 2005
  - Nicholas Clark 18:51 on 26 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
- Re: Subversion Robert G. Werner 02:10 on 27 Apr 2005
  - Juerd 09:59 on 27 Apr 2005
- Yoz Grahame 17:38 on 27 Apr 2005
  - Simon Wistow 18:10 on 27 Apr 2005
- Michael G Schwern 01:36 on 28 Apr 2005
  - Aaron J. Grier 19:14 on 29 Apr 2005

Generated at 02:00 on 03 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52