[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/28]
On Wed, Apr 27, 2005 at 05:12:52PM -0700, Aaron J. Grier wrote: > On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 09:15:12AM -0700, Michael G Schwern wrote: > > Dependencies might be bad but ya know what's worse? > > expanding dependencies. like government, they never seem to get > smaller. > > there's a nifty tool in pkgsrc/ports called pkgdepgraph that traces > through the (known registered) dependencies and spits out a directed > graph to graphviz. it always leaves me shaking my head. Does BSD ports have a concept of a "recommends"? "Its not required that you install this but it sure would be useful". ie. "perl recommends perl-documentation". Any packaging system which does not is worthy of hate. This includes, but is not limited to, RPM and CPAN (as currently implemented). Debian has things so well sliced up that perl-base depends simply on a grand total of libc6 which in turn depends on libdb1. Everything else is "recommended" or "suggested", even the core modules and documentation.
Generated at 02:00 on 03 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52