Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/26]

From: Arthur Bergman
Subject: Re: Subversion (was: Re: Upgrading without central packaging)
Date: 18:45 on 26 Apr 2005

On 26 Apr 2005, at 18:41, Chris Devers wrote:

> On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Robin Stephenson wrote:
>
>> A while back I built Subversion. There's software modularity and 
>> reuse, and
>> there's Dependency Madness:
>
> Indeed.
>
>     $ grep Depends 
> /sw/fink/10.3/unstable/main/finkinfo/devel/svn-0.33.1-11.info
>     Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r), swig (>= 1.3.16-12)
>     BuildDepends: apr (>= 0.9.5-1), db41 (>= 4.1.25-15), gdbm3, expat 
> (>= 1.95.6-2), libxml2 (>= 2.5.10-12), python | python-nox, fink (>= 
> 0.16.0-1), neon24 (>= 0.24.4-11), swig (>= 1.3.16-12), texinfo (>= 
> 4.2-22), libiconv-dev (>= 1.9.1-11), libtool14 (>= 1.5-1), apache2-dev 
> (>= 2.0.48-2), system-java14-dev
>       Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
>       BuildDependsOnly: True
>       Depends: apr-shlibs (>= 0.9.5-1), db41-shlibs (>= 4.1.25-15), 
> gdbm3-shlibs, expat-shlibs (>= 1.95.3-1), libxml2-shlibs (>= 
> 2.5.10-12), neon24-shlibs (>= 0.24.4-11), swig (>= 1.3.16-12), 
> system-java14
>       Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r)
>       BuildDependsOnly: True
>       Depends: %N-shlibs (= %v-%r), apache2 (>= 2.0.48-2)
>     $
>
> Why on earth should a frickin' source code management system depend, 
> not
> just on a web server, not just on Apache, but on frickin' Apache 2?
>
> Clearly these people hate the world.
>
> Clearly they want to make a new one in their image.
>
> That or, clearly, they just don't want people to use SVN.
>
> Works for me.
>
>


Guys guys guys, subversion is the reason I came up with the idea of 
this list!

Precursor hate is found at

http://use.perl.org/~sky/journal/13809

and

http://www.nntp.perl.org/group/perl.ponie.dev/15

Cheers
Arthur


-----
CTO @ Fotango Ltd
+447834716919
http://www.fotango.com/



-----
CTO @ Fotango Ltd
+447834716919
http://www.fotango.com/


______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

(no message)
- Upgrading without central packaging Juerd 13:21 on 23 Apr 2005
  - Re: Upgrading without central packaging peter (Peter da Silva) 14:16 on 23 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 22:49 on 23 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
- Michael G Schwern 23:29 on 23 Apr 2005
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 02:11 on 24 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - peter (Peter da Silva) 15:38 on 24 Apr 2005
- Re: Sending mail (was Re: Upgrading without central packaging) Chris Devers 18:19 on 24 Apr 2005
  - Re: Sending mail Daniel Pittman 00:48 on 25 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
- Xtina 17:01 on 26 Apr 2005
  - Simon Wistow 17:06 on 26 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - Earle Martin 01:22 on 03 May 2005
- peter (Peter da Silva) 17:37 on 26 Apr 2005
  - John Sinteur 17:41 on 26 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
  - Darrell Fuhriman 17:49 on 26 Apr 2005
  - David Cantrell 17:51 on 26 Apr 2005
- Arthur Bergman 18:45 on 26 Apr 2005
  - Nicholas Clark 18:51 on 26 Apr 2005
    - too deep to show
- Re: Subversion Robert G. Werner 02:10 on 27 Apr 2005
  - Juerd 09:59 on 27 Apr 2005
- Yoz Grahame 17:38 on 27 Apr 2005
  - Simon Wistow 18:10 on 27 Apr 2005
- Michael G Schwern 01:36 on 28 Apr 2005
  - Aaron J. Grier 19:14 on 29 Apr 2005

Generated at 02:00 on 03 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52