Re: Upgrading without central packaging

[prev] [thread] [next] [lurker] [Date index for 2005/04/24]

From: peter (Peter da Silva)
Subject: Re: Upgrading without central packaging
Date: 02:11 on 24 Apr 2005
> Whole new class of hate: supporting MacOS Classic.  Its hard enough having
> to deal with Windows 9x, Windows NT, VMS and all the scattered Unixen out 
> there, at least they're on speaking terms with POSIX.  MacOS Classic does
> EVERYTHING differently and in 1988 this might have been interesting but in
> 2005 its just embarassing.  I would rather (and do) code for VMS than 
> MacOS Classic and I HATE VMS.

Which brings us back to the "everything is really UNIX" meme.

> So who's shelling out $140 for 10.4?

I'm shelling out $70 for it.

> How long to you think it will be before
> it becomes impossible to find 10.3 software?

I'm still running 10.2 on some of mine.

> Hate.  But 10.1 and 10.2 were
> so hateful I can understand why folks dropped it like a hot iron.

10.1, yes.

10.2 was in some ways (Finder, [insert HATE here]) better than 10.3.

There's stuff above here

Generated at 02:00 on 03 May 2005 by mariachi 0.52